You could possibly remove it with a bespoke tiny screwdriver, but it’s obviously not what the company intended. That means that the strap colour you buy is the colour you’re stuck with, so choose carefully. While the Flex, Blaze and Alta all allow the Fitbit’s “brain” to be removed for charging, the device here is built into the strap. Unlike other Fitbit models, the Fitbit Charge HR cannot be customised. It’s certainly advantageous to offer both, and if there’s one thing that living with Android Wear has taught me, it’s that touchscreens and running don’t make for ideal bedfellows, so I’m happy to sidestep that particular input. The screen does the job, and it’s easy to cycle through the various tracking metrics that the Fitbit uses to keep an eye on things, either with the button on the side or by tapping the strap. Behind its simplicity is one piece of clever tech that other Fitbits lack, though: the “HR” in the name stands for heart rate. The Fitbit Charge HR is a simple beast: a textured, thick rubber strap with an LCD display and a button. Interested? This is what it’s like to do it.
Simply put, it’s a massive running and cycling tour of the UK thats starts Buckingham palace, winds its way up to Edinburgh Castle, and comes back down again. Is the Fitbit Charge HR worth buying in 2016, when the Blaze is more fully featured, and the Alta is sleeker and cheaper?Ĭall yourself a fitness enthusiast? If so, you’ll probably want to know about the Fitbit Fifty. The reason, chiefly, is that with Fitbit venturing into smartwatch territory, piling on features as it goes, the cheaper, more cheerful fitness band models still sell phenomenally well. Why are we reviewing the Fitbit Charge HR in 2016? That’s a very good question, given it’s now over a year old.
0 kommentar(er)
